The Supreme Court dismissed pleas seeking review of its verdict that ruled states have the power to tax mineral rights. Justice Nagarathna dissented, holding that only the Centre can levy the tax.

"The review petitions are dismissed. Having perused the review petitions, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules ...

Dismissing the review petitions, the Supreme Court said there was no error apparent in its decision allowing the ...

IMAGE: A view of the Supreme Court of India. Photograph: ANI Photo A seven-judge Constitution bench comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices BR Gavai, Vikram Nath, Bela Trivedi, Pankaj ...

The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a batch of petitions seeking a review of its August 1 order that empowered the States ...

The Union government has said that the classification of marital rape as an offence is "excessively harsh" and criminalising it would affect the sanctity of the ...

Bhubaneswar: The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed the petitions to review its judgment which held that the royalty paid by ...

The notices were issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, alleging under-reporting and misreporting of income beyond ...

A nine-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court on Friday rejected review petitions against its judgment which held that ...

A 7-judge Constitution Bench of the SC, held that States can identify more backwards among the SC categories and can ...

The Centre asked the Supreme Court not to criminalise marital rape as it can "have a far-reaching effect on the institution of marriage." It added there are other options that protect women’s consent ...

The Supreme Court has rejected the review petitions filed against its August 1 judgment which upheld the power of States to ...